RIGGING ELECTIONS IN GHANA IMPOSSIBLE! – PART TWO
In Part One of this two-part series, we discussed the process of voter registration, the exhibition of the provisional voters register, balloting for positions on the ballot paper, and the printing and distribution of ballot papers. Transparency is a key feature in Ghana’s electoral processes, allowing all stakeholders, especially political parties, to actively participate in and observe every step. Moreover, at any point in each electoral process, stakeholders can seek redress for any issues they are dissatisfied with. Political party representatives take part in the adjudication process, such as the District Registration Review Committee (DRRC) that examines and decides on registration challenge cases and the Adjudication Review Committee (ARC) that examines and decides on cases of multiple registration. In this concluding part, we will discuss what happens on Election Day. So, what makes Ghana’s electoral process so incontrovertible that even on Election Day, it is impossible to rig elections in Ghana? On Election Day On Election Day, political parties have their agents at all polling stations. There are also independent observers (both local and international) and the media present. At the beginning of voting, an empty transparent ballot box is shown to all stakeholders and voters present. The ballot box is then sealed with the seals of the Commission and political parties who choose to place their seals on it. At the close of voting, all parties ensure that the seals remain intact, confirming that no one has been able to open the ballot box in order to illegally stuff ballots into it. The ballot box is placed in full view of the public for the receipt of ballot papers. Pre-voting ballot accounting is done by election officials in the presence of party agents and observers. The total number of ballot papers is counted, and their serial numbers checked and recorded. Party agents, observer groups, and the media monitor the process of verifying voters, issuing of ballots to voters, and the voting process itself. At the close of voting, post-voting ballot accounting is done by election officials in the presence of party agents and observers. The Presiding Officer, who conducts the counting of votes, is required to wear white gloves and raise both hands to show that he or she is wearing those gloves. This measure prevents any situation where counting officers could use ink to spoil ballots cast at certain polling stations. With white gloves, stakeholders can easily notice any such nefarious actions. The seals are then broken off the ballot box, and the ballot papers are removed and placed on a clean table. The counting process, which is audible, is conducted in full view of all political party agents, observer groups, the media, and the general public. When the counting is completed, the results are entered on a carbonised Statement of Poll and Declaration of Results Form (a.k.a. Pink Sheet, a nickname given to the carbonised form because of its colour; the colour used to be blue, by the way, but was changed on the advice of the printers that you get better carbon copies with pink). The carbonised Pink Sheets are designed to ensure that there is a copy for every candidate in the election. Using carbonised Pink Sheets ensures that what is written on the first page appears on all other pages. For instance, if there are ten candidates in the presidential election, the Pink Sheet will have more than ten carbon copies to ensure that each candidate or their agent present at each polling station can have a copy. The Pink Sheet is signed by all agents, and the results are announced by the Presiding Officer. The law requires that a copy of the Pink Sheet is posted on the wall of the polling station. Copies are also given to all party agents, as mentioned earlier. Every member of the public can take a photo of the results. The media and some observers collate their results from these Pink Sheets, helping them to use parallel tabulation to be able to often project the results of the elections before the Electoral Commission officially declares the final results. If a party is not satisfied with the counting at a polling station, they can request a recount at the polling station. If they are still not satisfied, a second recount can be requested. The Presiding Officer may refuse to comply with the request for a second recount if, in their opinion, the request is unreasonable. They shall report the matter to the Returning Officer, who shall recount the ballots for that polling station only at the constituency collation centre. So, from all polling stations, political parties or their stakeholders need only to collate the results from the Pink Sheets—whether for the presidential or parliamentary election—just as the media and observer groups do. Whoever gets more votes from the polling station Pink Sheets across the country in the presidential election is the winner. Whoever gets more votes from the polling station Pink Sheets across any constituency in the parliamentary election is the winner of the parliamentary election in that constituency. It is the results from the Pink Sheets that determine the winner of the election, be they parliamentary or presidential. Collation and Declaration of Results For the presidential election, the whole country is one constituency. Therefore, all results from all polling stations must be added up so that the Chairperson of the Electoral Commission, who is the Returning Officer of the Presidential Election, can declare the winner. To sum up the results of the Presidential Election: The polling station Pink Sheets for each constituency are all sent to the Constituency Collation Centre. All the results from all polling stations in that constituency are added up, in the presence of political party agents. The winner for that constituency is announced, and a copy of the results is posted at the Constituency Collation Centre. The results, set out on the Presidential Election Results Collation Form (Form 9) and the Presidential Election Results Summary Sheet (Form 10), are then forwarded to
RIGGING ELECTIONS IN GHANA IMPOSSIBLE! – PART TWO Read More »
